II.2. Evidence from researcher interactions with human participants
To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.
For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.
William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:38 pm
An Example of Non-Replicable Good Science: Alice Goffman’s On the Run
Such important work cannot be done in ways that would satisfy the requirement of replicability, and not only for privacy reasons.  If Goffman’s study was held to the quantitativist ideal of transparency-for-replication, it would be deemed unworthy of recognition as science in our field, since it was too unique to be replicated.
But her work was original, insightful, and could be very useful to concerned policy makers who might not realize what harm their policy is causing to individuals, families, and communities in urban settings.
 Alice Goffman. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City (University of Chicago Press, 2014) For further readings see the announcement for the WPSA 2016 Pre-Conference Session entitled “Why Should We Believe You? Evidence and ‘Proof’ in Field and Other Interpretive Research” at https://wpsa.research.pdx.edu/meet/work ... hp#methods
 RE "replicability," see my comment in this thread, How Ethical Transparency and Methodological Transparency Differ