IV.3. Research with vulnerable and marginalized populations

Forum rules

We encourage contributors to the Discussion Board to publicly identify by registering and logging in prior to posting. However, if you prefer, you may post anonymously (i.e. without having your post be attributed to you) by posting without logging in. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.

To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.

For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.

Samantha Majic
John Jay College-CUNY
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 2:00 pm

any examples?

PostMon Nov 28, 2016 8:26 am

Please list citations for specific studies that employ particular transparency practices or practices that otherwise enhance the interpretability, evaluability, credibility, or quality of the research.

Post Reply


Re: any examples?

PostFri Dec 02, 2016 2:31 pm

Lutnick, Alexandra. "Beyond prescientific reasoning: The sex worker environmental assessment team study." In [i]Negotiating sex work: Unintended consequences of policy and activism[/i] Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2014: 31-52.

Post Reply

Tim Buthe
HfP/Technical Univ of Munich & Duke University
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:39 pm

Re: any examples?

PostFri Dec 02, 2016 8:21 pm

To the anonymous poster tho pointed out the chapter by A. Lutnick:
Thank you for providing a specific, useful example; that's greatly appreciated. It would be even more helpful if you elaborated in a couple of sentences on the practices used by this author to enhance the interpretability, evaluability, credibility, or quality of her research and in what sense you found those practices particularly helpful. Thanks again.

Post Reply