Substantive Dimensions of the Deliberations
We encourage contributors to the Discussion Board to publicly identify by registering and logging in prior to posting. However, if you prefer, you may post anonymously (i.e. without having your post be attributed to you) by posting without logging in. Anonymous posts will display only after a delay to allow for administrator review. Contributors agree to the QTD Terms of Use.
Instructions
To participate, you may either post a contribution to an existing discussion by selecting the thread for that topic (and then click on "Post Reply") or start a new thread by clicking on "New Topic" below.
The transition to Stage 2 of the deliberations is currently underway but will take some time to complete. In the meantime, we very much welcome additional contributions to the existing threads in this forum.
For instructions on how to follow a discussion thread by email, click here.
-
Deborah Yashar
Princeton University - Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 11:18 pm
[From Steering Committee] Research Communities and Transparency
You can help us by sharing scholarly norms, opportunities, and challenges when addressing transparency concerns within your research community/ies. What does transparency ideally and practically entail for scholarship in your research community/ies? What is expected of researchers who are addressing transparency concerns within your community/ies?
Some contributors have already begun articulating what transparency means for specific research approaches, but there is much more to be said. Any and all input is much appreciated.
Post Reply